CIVIL SERVANTS’ READINESS IN FACING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUREAUCRACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69916/jkbti.v5i1.471Keywords:
artificial intelligence, bureaucratic resistance, civil servants, digital literacy, local governmentAbstract
This study aims to analyze civil servants’ readiness in facing the implementation of artificial intelligence in local government bureaucracy. The study focuses on civil servants’ capacity, digital literacy, technological competence, organizational culture, and bureaucratic resistance to AI-based transformation. This research uses a qualitative method with an exploratory-descriptive approach and conceptual framework development. Data were collected from secondary and documentary sources, including recent peer-reviewed journal articles, policy documents, institutional reports, regulatory materials, and scholarly works related to AI adoption, digital transformation, civil-service competence, public-sector innovation, organizational culture, and bureaucratic resistance. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis by classifying findings into digital literacy, technological competence, organizational culture, leadership support, bureaucratic resistance, ethical awareness, and institutional support. The findings show that AI implementation in local government depends not only on technological infrastructure, but also on civil servants’ ability to operate digital systems, interpret algorithmic recommendations, evaluate data quality, and maintain public accountability. The study also finds that bureaucratic resistance may arise from fear of job displacement, loss of authority, weak technical confidence, rigid work culture, and lack of training. The main contribution of this study is the formulation of a human-centered AI readiness framework consisting of digital literacy, technological competence, adaptive organizational culture, ethical awareness, and institutional support. This framework emphasizes that civil servants are the key actors of successful AI transformation in local government bureaucracy.
Downloads
References
M. J. Ahn and Y.-C. Chen, “Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use AI in government,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, Art. no. 101664, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664.
R. Sandoval-Almazan, A. O. Millan-Vargas, and R. Garcia-Contreras, “Examining public managers’ competencies of artificial intelligence implementation in local government: A quantitative study,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 4, Art. no. 101986, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2024.101986.
K. Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, “Whether AI adoption challenges matter for public managers? The case of Polish cities,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3, Art. no. 101828, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101828.
G. Maragno, L. Tangi, L. Gastaldi, and M. Benedetti, “Exploring the factors, affordances and constraints outlining the implementation of artificial intelligence in public sector organizations,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 73, Art. no. 102686, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102686.
R. Madan and M. Ashok, “AI adoption and diffusion in public administration: A systematic literature review and future research agenda,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 1, Art. no. 101774, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101774.
A. Zuiderwijk, Y.-C. Chen, and F. Salem, “Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 3, Art. no. 101577, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577.
C. van Noordt and G. Misuraca, “Artificial intelligence for the public sector: Results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European Union,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, Art. no. 101714, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101714.
L. Tangi, A. P. R. Müller, and M. Janssen, “AI-augmented government transformation: Organisational transformation and the sociotechnical implications of artificial intelligence in public administrations,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, Art. no. 102055, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2025.102055.
P. G. R. de Almeida and C. D. dos Santos Jr., “Artificial intelligence governance: Understanding how public organizations implement it,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 1, Art. no. 102003, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2024.102003.
C. van Noordt and L. Tangi, “The dynamics of AI capability and its influence on public value creation of AI within public administration,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 4, Art. no. 101860, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101860.
N. Haug, S. Dan, and I. Mergel, “Digitally-induced change in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda,” Public Management Review, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1963–1987, 2024, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2234917.
H. Jo, “Interplay among collaborative culture, empowerment leadership, and IT work environment in the public sector: A mixed methods study,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 82, Art. no. 102883, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102883.
A. Scupola and I. Mergel, “Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation: The case of Denmark,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 1, Art. no. 101650, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101650.
J. I. Criado, A. Guevara-Gómez, and J. Villodre, “Digital public services: A study of innovation in public administrations,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 3, Art. no. 101583, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101583.
T. Chen, W. Guo, X. Gao, and Z. Liang, “AI-based self-service technology in public service delivery: User experience and influencing factors,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 4, Art. no. 101520, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101520.
T. S. Gesk and M. Leyer, “Artificial intelligence in public services: When and why citizens accept its usage,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, Art. no. 101704, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2022.101704.
T. Yigitcanlar, R. Y. M. Li, P. B. Beeramoole, and A. Paz, “Artificial intelligence in local government services: Public perceptions from Australia and Hong Kong,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 3, Art. no. 101833, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2023.101833.
A. Alshahrani, A. Griva, D. Dennehy, and M. Mäntymäki, “Artificial intelligence and decision-making in government functions: Opportunities, challenges and future research,” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 678–698, 2024, doi: 10.1108/TG-06-2024-0131.
A. Rizk and I. Lindgren, “Automated decision-making in public administration,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 42, no. 3, Art. no. 102061, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2025.102061.
H. de Bruijn, M. Warnier, and M. Janssen, “The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI: Strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, Art. no. 101666, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2021.101666.
S. Grimmelikhuijsen, “Explaining why the computer says no: Algorithmic transparency affects the perceived trustworthiness of automated decision-making,” Public Administration Review, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 241–262, 2023, doi: 10.1111/puar.13483.
B. Attard-Frost, A. Brandusescu, and K. Lyons, “The governance of artificial intelligence in Canada: Findings and opportunities from a review of 84 AI governance initiatives,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, Art. no. 101929, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2024.101929.
C. Wilson and M. van der Velden, “Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making,” Technology in Society, vol. 68, Art. no. 101926, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101926.
S. R. Chohan and G. Hu, “Strengthening digital inclusion through e-government: Cohesive ICT training programs to intensify digital competency,” Information Technology for Development, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 16–38, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2020.1841713.
M. S. Silitonga, “The public sector’s digital skills gap in Indonesia: The challenges and opportunities,” Jurnal Good Governance, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 70–79, 2023, doi: 10.32834/gg.v19i1.585.
Downloads
Published
Scite Metrics
Altmetric
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Marzuki, Mujahidin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Mujahidin, THE UTILIZATION OF BIG DATA IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING: A STUDY ON STRENGTHENING EVIDENCE-BASED POLICY IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT , Jurnal Kecerdasan Buatan dan Teknologi Informasi: Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): September 2025
- Mujahidin, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT DECISION-MAKING: OPPORTUNITIES, RISKS, AND GOVERNANCE CHALLENGES , Jurnal Kecerdasan Buatan dan Teknologi Informasi: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
- Muhammad Kautsar, Mujahidin, GOVERNMENT BIG DATA GOVERNANCE MODEL TO IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTEGRATED PUBLIC SERVICES , Jurnal Kecerdasan Buatan dan Teknologi Informasi: Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): September 2025













