PERLINDUNGAN HAK KONSTITUSIONAL WARGA NEGARA DALAM PENGGUNAAN BIG DATA OLEH PEMERINTAH DAERAH

Authors

  • Muhammad Suhardi Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
  • Abdul Wahab IPDN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69916/iuris.v1i2.464

Keywords:

administrative justice, big data governance, constitutional rights, local government, privacy

Abstract

Penggunaan big data oleh pemerintah daerah semakin penting dalam mendukung perencanaan pembangunan, penyaluran bantuan sosial, pelayanan publik, dan penyusunan kebijakan daerah berbasis bukti. Meskipun demikian, pemanfaatan data dalam skala besar juga menimbulkan risiko terhadap hak konstitusional warga negara, khususnya hak atas privasi, hak atas perlakuan yang sama, hak atas pelayanan publik yang adil, dan hak untuk bebas dari diskriminasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara dalam penggunaan big data oleh pemerintah daerah serta merumuskan model tata kelola data yang berorientasi pada prinsip non-diskriminasi, privasi, dan keadilan administratif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan hak konstitusional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penggunaan big data oleh pemerintah daerah tidak cukup dinilai dari aspek efisiensi, integrasi sistem, dan ketepatan sasaran kebijakan, tetapi juga harus dilihat dari kemampuannya melindungi warga dari pelanggaran privasi, diskriminasi berbasis data, dan ketidakadilan administratif. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penghubungan big data governance dengan perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara. Penelitian ini menawarkan model rights-based data governance yang mencakup legalitas pemrosesan data, pembatasan tujuan, kualitas data, perlindungan privasi, penilaian dampak diskriminasi, transparansi administratif, hak atas penjelasan, mekanisme koreksi dan keberatan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agbabiaka, O., Ojo, A., & Connolly, N. (2025). Requirements for trustworthy AI-enabled automated decision-making in the public sector: A systematic review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 215, 124076. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124076

Ariansyah, K., Setiawan, A. B., Hikmaturokhman, A., Ardison, A., & Walujo, D. (2024). Big data readiness in the public sector: An assessment model and insights from Indonesian local governments. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(2), 252–278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-01-2023-0010

Aoki, N., Tatsumi, T., Naruse, G., & Maeda, K. (2024). Explainable AI for government: Does the type of explanation matter to the accuracy, fairness, and trustworthiness of an algorithmic decision as perceived by those who are affected? Government Information Quarterly, 41(4), 101965. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101965

Beduschi, A. (2021). Rethinking digital identity for post-COVID-19 societies: Data privacy and human rights considerations. Data & Policy, 3, e15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/dap.2021.15

De Bruijn, H., Warnier, M., & Janssen, M. (2022). The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI: Strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101666. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101666

Gacutan, J., & Selvadurai, N. (2020). A statutory right to explanation for decisions generated using artificial intelligence. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(3), 193–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa016

Gasco-Hernandez, M., Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Luna-Reyes, L. F. (2022). Unpacking the role of technology, leadership, governance and collaborative capacities in inter-agency collaborations. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101710. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101710

Gesk, T. S., & Leyer, M. (2022). Artificial intelligence in public services: When and why citizens accept its usage. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101704. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101704

Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2023). Explaining why the computer says no: Algorithmic transparency affects the perceived trustworthiness of automated decision-making. Public Administration Review, 83(2), 241–262. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13483

Guenduez, A. A., Mettler, T., & Schedler, K. (2020). Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data? Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101406. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101406

Hossin, M. A., Du, J., Mu, L., & Asante, I. O. (2023). Big data-driven public policy decisions: Transformation toward smart governance. SAGE Open, 13(4), 1–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231215123

Kandt, J., & Batty, M. (2021). Smart cities, big data and urban policy: Towards urban analytics for the long run. Cities, 109, 102992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.102992

Kim, T. W., & Routledge, B. R. (2022). Why a right to an explanation of algorithmic decision-making should exist: A trust-based approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 32(1), 75–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2021.3

Kinchin, N. (2024). “Voiceless”: The procedural gap in algorithmic justice. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 32, eaae024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae024

Lnenicka, M., Hervert, P., & Horak, O. (2024). Understanding big data and data protection measures in smart city strategies: An analysis of 28 cities. Urban Governance, 4(4), 255–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2024.12.008

Mavriki, P., & Karyda, M. (2022). Big data analytics in e-government and e-democracy applications: Privacy threats, implications and mitigation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 14(1/2), 58–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2022.123251

Munch, L. A., Bjerring, J. C., & Mainz, J. T. (2024). Algorithmic decision-making: The right to explanation and the significance of stakes. Big Data & Society, 11(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231222872

Rizk, A., & Lindgren, I. (2025). Automated decision-making in public administration: Changing the decision space between public officials and citizens. Government Information Quarterly, 42(3), 102061. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102061

Ruijer, E. (2021). Designing and implementing data collaboratives: A governance perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), 101612. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101612

Starke, C., Baleis, J., Keller, B., & Marcinkowski, F. (2022). Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature. Big Data & Society, 9(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221115189

Sztandar-Sztanderska, K. (2025). How context matters: Human oversight of automated decision-making systems in welfare administration. Journal of European Social Policy. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287251358069

Van Noordt, C., & Misuraca, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence for the public sector: Results of landscaping the use of AI in government across the European Union. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101714. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101714

Vredenburgh, K. (2022). The right to explanation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 209–229. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12262

Williams, R. (2022). Rethinking administrative law for algorithmic decision making. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 468–494. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab032

Wouters, S., Janssen, M., Lember, V., & Crompvoets, J. (2023). Strategies to advance the dream of integrated digital public service delivery in inter-organizational collaboration networks. Government Information Quarterly, 40(1), 101779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101779

Yukhno, A. (2024). Digital transformation: Exploring big data governance in public administration. Public Organization Review, 24(1), 335–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-022-00694-x

Downloads

Published

2023-10-29

PlumX Metrics

Scite Metrics

Altmetric

How to Cite

Muhammad Suhardi, & Abdul Wahab. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HAK KONSTITUSIONAL WARGA NEGARA DALAM PENGGUNAAN BIG DATA OLEH PEMERINTAH DAERAH. IURIS NOTITIA : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM, 1(2), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.69916/iuris.v1i2.464