Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Kejahatan Sumber Daya Alam Di Indonesia: Problematika Dan Penguatan Penegakan Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69916/iuris.v4i2.715Keywords:
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi, Kejahatan Sumber Daya Alam, Penegakan Hukum, Enforce- ment Gap, Keadilan EkologisAbstract
Kejahatan di sektor sumber daya alam tidak hanya menimbulkan kerugian ekonomi, tetapi juga menyebabkan kerusakan ekologis dan dampak sosial yang luas. Dalam praktiknya, korporasi dapat terlibat sebagai pelaku sekaligus memperoleh manfaat ekonomi dari tindak pidana, sehingga pertanggungjawaban pidana perlu menjangkau entitas korporasi, bukan hanya individu pengurus. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan korporasi sebagai subjek hukum pidana, problematika penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi, serta strategi penguatan penegakan hukum dalam kejahatan sumber daya alam di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Bahan hukum dianalisis melalui penelaahan peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan putusan pengadilan yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengakuan korporasi sebagai subjek hukum pidana belum sepenuhnya diikuti penerapan penegakan hukum yang efektif. Hambatan utama meliputi fragmentasi regulasi sektoral, kompleksitas pembuktian kesalahan korporasi, keterbatasan kapasitas dan koordinasi kelembagaan, serta belum optimalnya penerapan sanksi yang mempertimbangkan keuntungan tindak pidana dan pemulihan ekologis. Penelitian ini mengembangkan kerangka enforcement gap yang terdiri atas tiga dimensi, yaitu normative gap, institutional gap, dan sanction gap. Ketiga dimensi tersebut menunjukkan bahwa persoalan pertanggungjawaban korporasi tidak semata-mata bersumber dari kekurangan norma, tetapi juga berkaitan dengan kapasitas institusi dan efektivitas pemidanaan. Oleh karena itu, penguatan penegakan hukum memerlukan harmonisasi regulasi, optimalisasi PERMA Nomor 13 Tahun 2016, peningkatan kemampuan aparat dalam menelusuri struktur serta manfaat korporasi, dan penerapan sanksi proporsional yang berorientasi pada pencegahan serta pemulihan lingkungan. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya pendekatan penegakan hukum yang terpadu, konsisten, transparan, akuntabel, dan berkeadilan ekologis dalam praktik penegakan hukum nasional.
Downloads
References
Almer, C., & Goeschl, T. (2010). Environmental crime and punishment: Empirical evidence from European-wide environmental inspections. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.05.002
Antypas, A., & Ali, S. H. (2018). Natural resource extraction and the corporatization of environmental governance. World Development, 101, 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.008
Baldwin, R., Cave, M., & Lodge, M. (2011). Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford University Press.
Bank, W. (2023). Indonesia Economic Prospects: Strengthening Resilience. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1990-7
Boaz, A., & Pawson, R. (2005). The rigor of qualitative evaluation in environmental and regulatory crime research. Evaluation, 11(3), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389005055536
Braithwaite, J. (1984). Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Braithwaite, J. (2010). The essence of responsive regulation. University of British Columbia Law Review, 43(3), 475–520.
Braithwaite, J. (2013). Corporate crime in the pharmaceutical industry (Routledge Revivals). Routledge.
Cameron, M., & Laycock, G. (2002). Crime prevention in Australia. The Cambridge Handbook of Australian Criminology, 313–331.
Carpenter, D., & Moss, D. A. (2014). Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139565877
Chang, L. Y. C., & Brewer, R. (2018). Criminal justice and regulation revisited: Essays in honour of Peter Grabosky. Routledge.
Clinard, M. B., & Yeager, P. C. (2006). Corporate Crime. Transaction Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315130868
Freiberg, A. (2017). Corporate governance, compliance, and the regulatory state. Regulation & Governance, 11(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12111
Gobert, J., & Punch, M. (2003). Rethinking corporate crime. Cambridge University Press.
Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (2005). When and why do plants comply? Paper mills in the US, Maine, and Wisconsin. Law & Policy, 27(2), 238–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2005.00199.x
Hamzah, A. (2017). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Khanna, V. S. (1996). Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve? Harvard Law Review, 109(7), 1477–1534. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342205
Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (2006). State-Corporate Crime and Criminological Inquiry. In State-Corporate Crime: Wrongdoing at the Intersection of Business and Government. Rutgers University Press.
Laufer, W. S. (2006). Corporate bodies and guilty minds: The failure of corporate criminal liability. University of Chicago Press.
Lynch, M. J., & Stretesky, P. B. (2014). Exploring Green Criminology: Toward a Green Criminological Revolution. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315871044
Lynch, M. J., Long, M. A., Barrett, K. L., & Stretesky, P. B. (2013). Is it a crime to produce ecological disorganization? Why green criminology and political economy matter in the analysis of global ecological harms. British Journal of Criminology, 53(6), 997–1016.
Michalowski, R., & Kramer, R. C. (2006). State-corporate crime and the built environment. Crime, Law and Social Change, 46(1), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-007-9057-0
Muladi, & Priyatno, D. (2010). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Nurse, A. (2015). Issues in policing wildlife crime. In Policing wildlife: Perspectives on the enforcement of wildlife legislation (pp. 112–128). Springer.
Parker, C., & Nielsen, V. L. (2009). Corporate compliance systems: Could they make any difference? Administration & Society, 41(1), 3–37.
Passas, N. (2005). Lawful but awful: 'Legal corporate crimes.' The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(6), 771–786.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi (2016).
Rothe, D. L., & Friedrichs, D. O. (2018). Crimes of globalization. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315180861
Simester, A. P., & Sullivan, G. R. (2021). Criminal law: Theory and doctrine (7th ed.). Hart Publishing.
Situ, Y., & Emmons, D. (2000). Environmental crime: The criminal justice system’s role in protecting the environment. SAGE Publications.
Walters, R. (2006). New directions in green criminology: Environmental crime, rights and the law. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 18(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2006.12036384
Wells, C. (2011). Corporations and criminal responsibility (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573172.001.0001
White, R. (2008). Crimes against nature: Environmental criminology and ecological justice. Willan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315250496
Downloads
Published
Scite Metrics
Altmetric
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Suryaningsi, Rosmini, Abdul Kadir Sabaruddin, A. Ummu Fauziyyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


